Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 24NNCV05804, Date: 2025-06-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24NNCV05804 Hearing Date: June 4, 2025 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
|
|
) |
|
I.
INTRODUCTION
On November 14, 2024, plaintiff
American Express National Bank (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
defendant Roy Katan (“Defendant”) for money owed under two different accounts.
On January 13, 2025, Defendant filed this motion arguing that Plaintiff should
be compelled to mediate this matter. The motion is brought pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 1281.2 and 1281.4.
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
CCP 1281.2 states, in relevant part: “On
petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a
written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party to the agreement
refuses to arbitrate that controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and
the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement
to arbitrate the controversy exists….” CCP 1281.4 provides, in relevant part: “If
a court of competent jurisdiction, whether in this State or not, has ordered
arbitration of a controversy which is an issue involved in an action or
proceeding pending before a court of this State, the court in which such action
or proceeding is pending shall, upon motion of a party to such action or
proceeding, stay the action or proceeding until an arbitration is had in
accordance with the order to arbitrate or until such earlier time as the court
specifies.”
III.
DISCUSSION
Defendant, as the moving party, argues
that this action should be dismissed because Plaintiff failed to send him a
claim notice and Defendant elects mediation in order to resolve this dispute. Defendant’s
position is meritless.
Defendant refers to a “mandatory
mediation clause” found in the Terms and Conditions of his Cardmember Agreement
with Plaintiff (“Agreement”) between the parties which states:
Before beginning a lawsuit, mediation
or arbitration, you and we agree to send a written notice (a claim notice) to
each party against whom a claim is asserted, in order to provide an opportunity
to resolve the claim informally or through mediation. Go to
americanexpress.com/ claim for a sample claim notice. The claim notice must
describe the claim and state the specific relief demanded. Notice to you may be
provided by your billing statement or sent to your billing address. Notice to
us must include your name, address and Account number and be sent to American
Express ADR c/o CT Corporation System, 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York
10005. If the claim proceeds to arbitration, the amount of any relief demanded
in a claim notice will not be disclosed to the arbitrator until after the
arbitrator rules.
…
In mediation, a neutral mediator helps
parties resolve a claim. The mediator does not decide the claim but helps
parties reach agreement. Before beginning mediation, you or we must first send
a claim notice. Within 30 days after sending or receiving a claim notice, you
or we may submit the claim to JAMS (1-800-352-5267, jamsadr.com) or the
American Arbitration Association ("AAA") (1-800-778-7879, adr.org)
for mediation. We will pay the fees of the mediator. adr.org) for mediation.
All mediation-related communications
are confidential, inadmissible in court and not subject to discovery. All applicable
statutes of limitation will be tolled from the date you or we send the claim
notice until termination of the mediation. Either you or we may terminate the
mediation at any time. The submission or failure to submit a claim to mediation
will not affect your or our right to elect arbitration.
(Motion, Ex. A, p. 7.) This section of the Agreement does
not provide a basis for this motion as there is nothing in this section
requiring mediation. The section specifically says that “[e]ither [party] may
terminate the mediation at any time.” (Ibid.) Case law supports the view
that the Court may not compel mediation. “Essential to the mediation process is
the concept that the parties are in control of resolving their own dispute.” (Jeld-Wen,
Inc. v. Superior Court (2007) 146 Cal.App.4th 536, 540.) “[U]nless the
parties have agreed to a binding award, any party who voluntarily enters
mediation may revoke its consent and withdraw from the dispute resolution
process.” (Id. at 541.) “[P]arties cannot be forced or coerced over the
threat of sanctions into attending and paying for private mediation as this is
antithetical to the entire concept of mediation.” (Id. at 543.) Accordingly,
there is no basis for the court to “compel” the parties to mediate and the
motion to compel mediation is DENIED.
The Court
also denies Defendant’s request for dismissal due to Plaintiff’s purported
failure to send him a “claim notice” before filing this action. Plaintiff’s
opposition brief includes a declaration attaching two different notices dated
June 5 and 25, 2024, and a credit card billing statement with a closing date of
September 24, 2024. Defendant argues that these documents are inadequate
because they do not offer mediation or identify the dispute “in a legal sense.”
(Reply, p. 2.) This is unpersuasive. The notices attached by Plaintiff identify
the amounts owed and in the context of a credit card agreement, identifying the
amount owed is sufficient to give notice of the alleged dispute. Moreover, the
Agreement specifically allows for notice to the credit card holder to be
“provided by [their] billing statement.” The Agreement also states that the
purpose of a claim notice is to “provide an opportunity to resolve the claim
informally or through mediation.” Although the documents sent by Plaintiff do
not specifically reference mediation, they state that Plaintiff is “committed
to working with you to identify a solution” to pay or resolve Defendant’s unpaid
balance (Jun Decl., Exs. 1-2) and urge Defendant to contact Plaintiff “as soon
as possible to explore possible payment solutions.” (Ex. 2.) Therefore, the
documents meet the Agreement’s requirements for a “claim notice” and Defendant
has forfeited his right to elect mediation by failing to initiate proceedings
with JAMS or AAA within 30 days of receiving them.
IV.
CONCLUSION
In light of the forgoing, Defendant’s
motion to compel mediation and dismiss the action is DENIED in its entirety.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A.
Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.