Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: BC702202, Date: 2022-10-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC702202 Hearing Date: October 26, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
DANIEL
OROZCO DIAZ, Plaintiff(s), vs. RONALD
GLEN DAVIS, Defendant(s), |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. October
26, 2022 |
On
August 10, 2022, Defendant Ronald Glen Davis’ counsel, Phillip T.S. Tukia and
Morgenstern Law Group, filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. On August 30, 2022, the Court continued the
hearing to September 15, 2022, so that counsel could file a revised proposed
order. A revised proposed order was
filed on September 6, 2022. The order was
improperly filled out because Item 3b was incomplete and Item 6 stated that the
provided address is Defendant’s “last known” which contradicts counsel’s
previously-filed declaration in which he represented that he was able to
confirm his client’s address as current.
On September
19, 2022, counsel filed a declaration confirming that Plaintiff’s address was
current. However, several days later on
September 21, 2022, counsel filed a proposed order which indicates that the
provided address is Plaintiff’s “last known” address. On September 26, 2022, the Court continued
the hearing to October 26, 2022. On
October 14, 2022, a declaration from Linda Johnson was filed. Johnson explains that the service address
provided for Defendant is his “last known” address, while the electronic email
address provided is “current”. (Johnson
Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.) In light of this
declaration, the motion to be relieved is GRANTED and effective on October 27,
2022.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.